EN
Scan your website

What does web accessibility cost?

The honest answer starts with “it depends”, but not on everything. This article sets out what an audit costs in five European markets, what drives the cost of fixing a site, what tools charge per month, and how the European Accessibility Act treats “too expensive”. With sources, and without a flat rate.

Published 25 October 2026 · Libration editorial team · 8 min read
In short The cost splits into four items: finding out where you stand, fixing the problems, tools, and ongoing upkeep. A manual expert audit of a small business website usually costs four figures. What the fixes cost depends almost entirely on the starting point; there is no serious flat rate. The most expensive route is retrofitting accessibility after a redesign.

1. The four cost items

When people ask what an accessible website costs, they are really asking about four different things:

ItemWhat it includesOrder of magnitude
Finding out where you standAutomated scan, manual expert auditScan often free; manual audit usually four figures
Fixing the problemsTheme, forms, colours, alt text, documentsDepends on the starting point; no serious flat rate
ToolsChecker plugins, monitoring, widgetsFrom free to several hundred euros or dollars a month
UpkeepPublishing new content accessibly, re-checking regularlyMostly staff time

The items are linked. A good audit makes the fixes cheaper because nobody works on the wrong thing. And a team that publishes new content properly has less to repair later.

2. What an audit costs

Automated scan

An automated scan checks a page in seconds for things like missing alt text, low contrast or unlabelled form fields. Many of these tools are free, including our website scan, the WAVE browser extension and the free version of axe DevTools. Their limit is well known: automated tests find only part of the problems. Whether an alt text actually describes the image, or whether a menu works with the keyboard, has to be checked by a person. See testing accessibility.

Manual audit

There is no official price survey in any European country. What exists are guide prices from testing schemes and the published ranges of agencies. Treat the following as indications, not market data:

MarketPublished figuresSource type
GermanyBIK BITV test: €420–900 per tested page depending on complexity, plus an unpublished base feeGuide price of the testing scheme
FranceRGAA audit of a brochure site from about €1,500–3,000; e-commerce from about €4,500Agency price lists
SpainBasic manual audit of 10–20 pages about €1,500–4,000; entry offers from €300Agency price lists
ItalyManual expert audit about €1,500–4,000; entry offers from €350Agency price lists

Most sources quote prices excluding VAT; some do not say. The cheapest offers usually test a few pages, sometimes only automatically. Ask how many pages go into the sample, whether testing includes a screen reader and the keyboard, and whether you get a report with concrete fixes rather than a list of error codes.

3. What the fixes cost

This is the uncomfortable part: we found no reliable, independent figure for “fixing a website”, and no well-sourced percentage surcharge over a normal web project. Agencies publish their own entry prices, and these vary by a factor of ten. They are offers, not market values.

What can be said is that the cost depends almost entirely on the starting point. Cheap, and often doable in-house:

  • adding missing or poor alt text,
  • a clean heading structure and descriptive link text,
  • declaring the page language correctly,
  • writing an accessibility statement.

It gets expensive when the foundations are wrong:

  • The theme: if the navigation cannot be used with a keyboard or the focus is invisible, someone has to touch the code. Sometimes switching themes is cheaper than repairing one.
  • Forms and checkouts: error messages, labels and CAPTCHAs affect exactly the pages the European Accessibility Act is about.
  • Brand colours: if the house colour on white fails the contrast ratio, that is a design decision, not a coding task.
  • Legacy content: hundreds of PDFs or videos without captions. Sorting out what is still needed helps. See accessible PDF.

The most important saving is timing. If a redesign is planned, accessibility belongs in the brief from day one. The W3C Web Accessibility Initiative points out that accessibility is cheapest when it is built into ongoing development. Retrofitting costs more.

4. What tools cost

For WordPress there are checker plugins that show problems in the dashboard, and widgets that offer visitors settings such as larger text. A selection of public list prices, checked on 25 October 2026:

ToolTypeEntry price
WP AccessibilityWordPress plugin, fixes in the codefree
Accessibility Checker (Equalize Digital)WordPress plugin, checks in the dashboardfree; Pro $190 a year for one site
Pope TechTesting platformfree up to 25 pages; Team from $25 a month billed annually
UserWayWidget with automated remediation$490 a year up to 100,000 page views a month
accessiBeWidget with automated remediation$59 a month or $490 a year up to 5,000 visits a month
Siteimprove, Silktide, Eye-AblePlatforms with monitoringno public price, quote only
Libration (our plugin, for comparison)WordPress plugin, fixes in the code, report, widgetfree; Pro €14.90 a month billed annually, excl. VAT

Be careful with widgets that promise to make a site “compliant” automatically. In January 2025 the US Federal Trade Commission required accessiBe to pay one million dollars over exactly that claim. The European Disability Forum and the IAAP have stated that overlays do not make a website compliant with European accessibility legislation. And in the United States, where accessibility lawsuits are routine, UsableNet’s tracker counted 91 of 360 lawsuits in September 2026 against websites that used such a widget.

A widget can be useful as an addition. If you pay for it every month and leave the errors in the code, you end up with both: running costs and the barriers. The plugin comparison explains the differences.

5. “Too expensive” as an exemption?

The European Accessibility Act does contain a cost limit. Under Article 14 of Directive (EU) 2019/882, the requirements apply only where they do not impose a disproportionate burden. You assess this yourself, using three criteria from Annex VI:

  • the net costs of compliance relative to your overall operating and capital expenditure,
  • the estimated costs and benefits for you relative to the estimated benefit for persons with disabilities, taking into account how often and by how many the service is used,
  • the net costs of compliance relative to your net turnover.

The assessment must be documented, kept for five years, handed to the authorities on request, and, for services, repeated at least every five years. Except for micro-enterprises, you must also inform the market surveillance authorities. If you received public or private funding to improve accessibility, you cannot rely on the exemption. So it is not a free pass but a documented weighing that has to withstand scrutiny. Micro-enterprises providing services (fewer than ten staff and no more than €2 million turnover or balance sheet total) do not need it: they are exempt altogether. The national rules are summarised in the EAA across Europe.

Public funding for website accessibility is thin. In the markets we looked at, we found no national programme open in October 2026 that names accessible websites explicitly. Spain’s Kit Digital closed to new applications at the end of October 2025; several regional digitalisation vouchers in France and Italy exclude simple websites. Ask your chamber of commerce what applies locally.

6. What doing nothing costs

  • Customers: the W3C cites more than one billion people with disabilities worldwide. In Germany alone, 7.8 million people had a recognised severe disability at the end of 2025, 9.4 percent of the population. Add everyone with poor eyesight, a hand that is busy, or a phone in bright sunlight.
  • Authorities: the Directive sets no fine itself, but the national laws do. What has actually happened so far is set out in EAA fines and enforcement.
  • The EU view: the Commission’s 2015 impact assessment expected a single set of rules to save businesses up to half of the cost of complying with diverging national requirements. That is a saving from harmonisation, not a saving per website, but it shows that the rules were designed with cost in mind.

7. How to keep costs down

  1. Find out where you stand. A free scan shows whether you are talking about a few alt texts or about the theme.
  2. Do the easy things yourself. Alt text, headings, link text and the accessibility statement do not need an agency.
  3. Set priorities. Start with the pages where contracts are made: contact, booking, checkout.
  4. Get targeted testing. A manual test of your key pages is worth more than a large audit whose report ends up in a drawer.
  5. Plan it into the redesign. Accessibility belongs in the brief, not in a change request.
  6. Publish new content properly. It takes a few minutes per post and saves the next repair.
Know where you stand before you calculate The website scan checks a page in a few seconds and lists the barriers it finds, free of charge. It does not replace a manual audit, but it tells you where to start. Our own plans are on the pricing page.

Sources and notes

This article is a market overview and is not a quote or legal advice.